Enhancing Medical Care Through NGO-Medical Institution Partnerships

NGOs and medical institutions often collaborate in various ways to enhance the quality and accessibility of healthcare services. These partnerships are particularly vital in regions where healthcare infrastructure is lacking or where specific health crises arise, necessitating immediate and effective responses.

Expanding Access to Healthcare Services

One of the primary ways NGOs and medical institutions cooperate is by expanding access to healthcare services in remote or underserved areas. NGOs frequently have the on-the-ground presence and local knowledge that enable them to identify and address gaps in healthcare provision. They often work alongside hospitals, clinics, and other medical facilities to set up mobile clinics, organize health camps, and implement outreach programs that bring essential services to those who might otherwise go without care.

For instance, in rural areas of developing countries, where medical facilities are sparse and travel to urban centers is challenging, NGOs often collaborate with local health institutions to deploy mobile health units. These units, equipped with basic medical supplies and staffed by trained professionals, travel to isolated communities to provide primary healthcare, vaccinations, and maternal and child health services. This collaboration not only increases access to healthcare but also builds trust within communities, encouraging more people to seek medical assistance when needed.

Beyond improving access to healthcare, NGOs are essential in educating communities on health matters, preventive measures, and the need for timely medical intervention. Their educational initiatives are frequently carried out in collaboration with local medical institutions, ensuring that the information shared is both accurate and culturally sensitive, while aligning with national health guidelines. This approach leads to a better-informed public that is more capable of managing its health effectively, thereby alleviating pressure on already strained medical facilities.

Addressing Specific Health Crises

Another significant area of cooperation between NGOs and medical institutions is in responding to health crises, such as outbreaks of infectious diseases, natural disasters, or conflict-related health emergencies. In such situations, the rapid and coordinated response made possible by these partnerships can be the difference between containment and widespread disaster.

During the Ebola crisis in West Africa, NGOs collaborated closely with both local and international medical institutions to deliver essential support to the affected regions. NGOs were instrumental in establishing treatment centers, training healthcare personnel, and engaging with communities to raise awareness about virus prevention. Meanwhile, medical institutions contributed their expertise and resources for patient care and disease research. This partnership not only aided in controlling the outbreak but also reinforced the region’s healthcare infrastructure, making it more resilient to future health emergencies.

Similarly, in the aftermath of natural disasters like earthquakes or hurricanes, NGOs often partner with medical institutions to deliver emergency medical care to affected populations. They help to establish temporary medical facilities, distribute essential supplies, and coordinate the logistics of patient care. This rapid response is crucial in preventing the spread of disease and addressing the immediate health needs of those impacted by the disaster.

Increasing Efficiency Through NGO-Medical Institution Collaboration

Beyond improving medical care, the cooperation between NGOs and medical institutions also leads to increased efficiency in healthcare delivery. By sharing resources, expertise, and infrastructure, these partnerships can reduce duplication of efforts, lower costs, and ensure that healthcare services are provided in a more streamlined and effective manner.

Resource Sharing and Capacity Building

One of the key benefits of NGO-medical institution partnerships is the ability to share resources, such as medical supplies, equipment, and personnel. NGOs often have access to funding and donations that can be used to purchase much-needed medical equipment, which they then provide to partner institutions. In return, medical institutions offer training and capacity-building opportunities to NGO staff, ensuring that they are well-equipped to deliver high-quality care.

For example, in many regions, NGOs provide medical institutions with donated equipment, such as X-ray machines, ultrasound devices, or laboratory supplies. These donations are often accompanied by training programs that teach local healthcare workers how to use and maintain the equipment effectively. This not only improves the quality of care provided but also enhances the overall capacity of the medical institution to serve its community.

In addition to equipment, NGOs often facilitate the sharing of medical expertise between institutions. They may organize exchange programs or provide funding for medical professionals to attend specialized training courses. This cross-pollination of knowledge helps to raise the standard of care across the board, ensuring that even in resource-limited settings, patients receive the best possible treatment.

Streamlining Healthcare Delivery

NGOs and medical institutions also collaborate to streamline healthcare delivery, making it more efficient and reducing the burden on healthcare systems. One way they achieve this is by implementing integrated healthcare models that combine the strengths of both partners to provide comprehensive care.

For instance, some NGOs work with medical institutions to develop community-based healthcare programs that focus on prevention, early detection, and management of chronic diseases. These programs often involve training community health workers to conduct screenings, provide basic care, and refer patients to medical facilities when necessary. By addressing health issues at the community level, these programs reduce the number of patients who require hospitalization or specialized treatment, thereby easing the strain on medical institutions.

Additionally, NGOs often assist medical institutions in adopting new technologies and innovative practices that can improve efficiency. This might include implementing electronic health records (EHR) systems, which streamline patient information management, or introducing telemedicine services, which allow patients in remote areas to consult with specialists without the need to travel. By integrating these technologies into their operations, medical institutions can provide more timely and accurate care, while also reducing costs and improving patient outcomes.

Conclusion

The collaboration between NGOs and medical institutions represents a significant driving force in advancing global healthcare. By joining forces, these entities can elevate the quality of medical care, broaden service accessibility, and boost healthcare system efficiency. Whether addressing healthcare needs in underserved regions, tackling health emergencies, or pooling resources and expertise, the alliance between NGOs and medical organizations is crucial for fostering a healthier and more equitable world. As these partnerships develop, they are expected to play an increasingly pivotal role in tackling the multifaceted health challenges that lie ahead.

The post Cooperation Between NGOs and Medical Institutions appeared first on VP-btqd-GL.

The Role of Flight Tracking in Crisis Response

When a crisis strikes, time is of the essence. Human rights organizations must not only identify the most affected areas but also deploy their teams swiftly to provide aid, monitor the situation, and document human rights violations. In these critical moments, flight tracking technology plays a vital role in facilitating rapid and organized response efforts.

NGOs rely on flight tracking services to keep tabs on flight availability, monitor real-time progress, and adapt their plans accordingly. This is especially vital in areas with compromised or limited transportation infrastructure. For example, during a natural disaster, airports might be closed or only partially operational, causing delays or cancellations. By receiving real-time updates from flight tracking services, NGOs can swiftly find alternative routes or adjust their schedules, reducing delays and ensuring their teams reach the crisis area as quickly as possible.

In addition, flight tracking allows organizations to synchronize the arrival of teams coming from various locations, ensuring that all members reach the crisis zone together. This coordination is essential for maintaining the efficiency and safety of their operations, as staggered arrivals can result in disorganized efforts and heightened risks for team members.

Enhancing Safety and Security for Human Rights Defenders

In many cases, human rights defenders operate in hostile or unstable environments where their safety is at risk. Whether they are traveling to document abuses in conflict zones or to provide support to displaced populations, the security of these individuals is paramount. Flight tracking services offer an additional layer of protection by allowing NGOs to monitor the exact location of their personnel throughout their journey.

By tracking flights in real time, organizations can anticipate potential security threats, such as civil unrest or military activity near airports, and adjust travel plans accordingly. In some cases, flight tracking may reveal that a planned route is no longer safe, prompting the organization to divert their teams to a safer location. This proactive approach to travel security can significantly reduce the risks faced by human rights defenders, enabling them to carry out their work more effectively.

Furthermore, flight tracking can help NGOs maintain communication with their teams during transit. By knowing the exact location of a flight, organizations can plan check-ins at key points in the journey, ensuring that team members remain in contact and can report any issues or concerns. This continuous line of communication is essential for maintaining the safety and well-being of human rights defenders, particularly in high-risk environments.

Streamlining Logistics and Resource Allocation

Effective crisis response requires more than just getting people to the right place; it also involves the careful coordination of resources and supplies. Flight tracking services are invaluable in this regard, allowing NGOs to plan the transportation of essential items such as medical supplies, food, and equipment in a timely and efficient manner.

For example, if an organization needs to deliver medical supplies to a remote area affected by a natural disaster, flight tracking can help them identify the quickest and most reliable flights available. By tracking these flights in real time, NGOs can ensure that the supplies are delivered as scheduled, avoiding delays that could jeopardize the health and safety of those in need.

In addition to tracking commercial flights, some flight tracking services also provide information on cargo and private flights, which can be crucial for NGOs that rely on these options for transporting large quantities of supplies or for reaching areas not serviced by commercial airlines. By having access to this data, organizations can make informed decisions about how best to allocate their resources, ensuring that aid reaches its destination as quickly and efficiently as possible.

Up-to-the-Minute Data for Smart Decision-Making

The unpredictable nature of crises means that ground conditions can shift rapidly. A route or destination that was safe yesterday might become hazardous today. This level of uncertainty demands that NGOs remain flexible and make decisions grounded in the latest information. Flight tracking services offer real-time data, which is essential for making well-informed decisions in such situations.

For instance, if an NGO has a team en route to a crisis zone and receives intelligence that the security situation at the destination has deteriorated, they can use flight tracking to divert the team to an alternate location before they arrive. This ability to react in real time to changing conditions can mean the difference between a successful mission and a failed one.

In addition to responding to immediate threats, flight tracking data can also be used to analyze trends and patterns over time. For example, an organization might notice that flights to a particular region are consistently delayed or rerouted due to weather conditions or other factors. Armed with this information, they can adjust their future travel plans to account for these issues, reducing the likelihood of disruptions.

Conclusion: The Future of Crisis Response and Flight Tracking

As the world becomes more interconnected and crises become more complex, the ability to respond quickly and effectively is more important than ever for human rights organizations. Flight tracking services have become an essential tool for these NGOs, enabling them to mobilize quickly, enhance team safety, and optimize aid delivery.

Looking ahead, the role of flight tracking in crisis response is likely to continue growing as technology advances. New features, such as predictive analytics and integration with other crisis management tools, could further enhance the capabilities of NGOs, allowing them to respond even more effectively to the challenges they face.

In the end, the goal of every human rights organization is to protect and uphold the rights of individuals, particularly in times of crisis. By embracing the latest tools and technologies, including flight tracking, these organizations can ensure that they are always ready to meet this goal, no matter where in the world they are needed.

The post Human Rights Defenders on the Move: How Flight Tracking Helps NGOs Respond Quickly to Crises appeared first on VP-btqd-GL.

While these Ausse online casinos have brought excitement and entertainment to millions of Australian gamblers, they also come with ethical concerns regarding responsible gambling and the protection of vulnerable individuals. This article explores the rise of PayID casinos, the ethical challenges they present, the potential for collaboration with Human Rights Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), measures to promote ethical gambling practices, and the delicate balance between profit and ethics in the industry.

The Rise of PayID Casinos and Ethical Concerns

PayID casinos have gained widespread popularity due to their user-friendly payment processes and attractive gaming offerings. However, their accessibility and anonymity have raised ethical concerns that need to be addressed.

The following are the key ethical concerns associated with PayID casinos https://onlinecasinoaustralia.online/payid-casinos/ (source):

1. Problem Gambling: Online casinos, including PayID casinos, have been linked to an increase in problem gambling behavior. The ease of access, constant availability, and lack of face-to-face interaction may exacerbate compulsive gambling tendencies.
2. Protection of Vulnerable Individuals: The protection of vulnerable individuals, such as minors and those with gambling addiction issues, is of utmost importance. Online gambling environments must take measures to prevent exploitation and harm to such individuals.
3. Privacy and Data Protection: The collection and use of user data in PayID casinos raise questions about privacy and data protection rights. Responsible data handling practices are essential to safeguard user information.
4. Fair Gaming and Transparency: To build trust among players, PayID casinos must ensure fair gaming practices and transparency in their operations, including game algorithms and payout structures.

Collaboration between PayID Casinos and Human Rights NGOs

Collaborating with Human Rights NGOs presents a unique opportunity for PayID casinos to address the ethical concerns in online gambling and promote responsible gaming practices. Such partnerships can yield several positive outcomes:

Research and Data Collection: Human Rights NGOs can contribute to research on gambling behavior and its impact on vulnerable groups, providing valuable insights for the industry to design effective responsible gambling measures.

Awareness and Education: Collaborating with NGOs allows PayID casinos to develop educational campaigns that raise awareness about responsible gambling practices, potential risks, and available support services.

Ethical Business Practices: NGOs can encourage PayID casinos to adopt ethical business practices, such as transparent terms and conditions, fair gaming algorithms, and responsible marketing strategies.

Support for Gambling Addicts: By working with NGOs, casinos can provide resources and support networks for individuals struggling with gambling addiction, ensuring they receive the help they need.

Measures to Promote Ethical Gambling

Incorporating measures to promote ethical gambling is vital for the sustainable growth of PayID casinos and the well-being of their players. Some effective measures include:

Balancing Profit and Ethics

Balancing profit and ethics is a critical aspect of promoting ethical gambling in PayID casinos. While profitability is essential for the sustainability of the business, it should not come at the expense of ethical considerations.

It is crucial for PayID casinos to:

Prioritize Player Welfare: Ensure that player welfare and responsible gambling take precedence over short-term profits.

Transparent Communication: Engage in transparent communication with players regarding the risks of gambling and the availability of responsible gambling tools.

Adhere to Regulations: Comply with relevant regulatory frameworks and industry standards to protect player rights and interests.

Continuous Improvement: Continuously evaluate and improve responsible gambling measures based on user feedback and industry best practices.

Conclusion

Promoting еthicаl gаmbling prаctices in PаyID cаsinоs is а shаred responsibility thаt requires collаborаtive efforts between thе industry аnd Humаn Rights NGОs. Вy аddressing thе еthicаl concеrns, imрlementing resрonsible gаmbling meаsures, аnd suppоrting individuаls аffected by gаmbling аddiction, thе onlinе gаmbling industry cаn creаte а sаfer аnd mоre enjoyаble gаming environment for plаyers. Striking а bаlаnce between prоfit аnd ethics is cruciаl tо еnsurе thе long-term sustаinаbility оf thе industry аnd thе prоtectiоn оf humаn rights. Embrаcing еthicаl рrinciрles cаn leаd tо а positive trаnsformаtion in thе onlinе gаmbling lаndscаpe, whеrе plаyers’ wеll-bеing аnd resрonsible gаming аre аt thе forefront оf thе gаming exрerience.

The post <strong>Promoting Ethical Gambling: PayID Casinos and Human Rights NGOs in Australia</strong> appeared first on VP-btqd-GL.

Society operates through a combination of government structure and member self-organization.

The growth of non-state actors, including transnational actors like international non-governmental organizations (NGOs), is a reflection of society’s self-organization. The development of NGOs has been steadily increasing since the early 1900s, with Europe and America being home to over 100 pacifist public organizations. Governments have historically been wary of non-state organizations lacking official state status.

Following the First World War, the League of Nations began engaging with representatives from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) during its meetings. This trend continued into the early 1950s, when international non-governmental organizations emerged as a significant, yet relatively uncharted territory in the field of international relations.

During the latter half of the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first century, there was a rise in the number of non-governmental entities. This increase in transnational actors brought about new labels, including third sector organizations, non-profit organizations, volunteer organizations, civil society organizations, social movement organizations, and self-help organizations.

The legal and financial considerations of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs).

There has been a growing recognition of the importance of defining the legal status of non-governmental organizations. At first, they were seen only as a component of international relations. Some legal experts disagreed with giving NGOs subject status, arguing that their role was not to challenge state sovereignty, but to build horizontal relationships across borders.

The European Convention on the Recognition by Legal Persons of International Non-Governmental Organizations was adopted in 1986 after discussions in the Council of Europe. The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe created a document in 2003 titled “Fundamental Principles on the Status of Non-Governmental Organizations in Europe” based on this Convention. The document emphasizes that NGO structures should be democratic, not hierarchical like some military or religious associations or secret societies. An NGO is considered international if it has at least two foreign members and is open to all who meet its activity requirements. NGOs position themselves as non-profit organizations, but can engage in commercial activities as long as the profits are used for their goals.

The NGO relies on contributions from associate members and operates under the laws of its governing country. It is important for the organization to maintain independence in its actions, regardless of any state funding it may receive.

Non-government organizations with an international scope are currently involved in network diplomacy as participants.

The changing global landscape, with factors such as the rise of international actors and advancements in technology, has resulted in a blending of domestic and foreign policies. NGOs are increasingly taking on roles that were traditionally held by states in various areas of international cooperation.

In recent times, “track two diplomacy” has emerged as a strategy involving specialized individuals who engage in establishing connections, fostering collaboration, conducting informal discussions, and aiding in conflict resolution. Non-government organizations are also recognized as a crucial element of “soft power”.

The rise in the number of organizations granted consultative status with the UN indicates the recognition of NGOs’ significance in global politics.

NGOs are playing a growing role in areas previously handled by official diplomacy. This requires creative state thinking and a change in traditional approaches. Some believe professional diplomacy will focus only on “high politics”, like preserving peace and protecting modern national interests. NGOs will handle alliances and coalitions to cooperate in the economy, environmental protection, and humanitarianism. The distinction between “high” and ordinary politics may become increasingly arbitrary.

Are NGOs free from the pain points of our time?

NGOs are facing problems with corruption, including bribery, nepotism, and embezzlement. This undermines the reputation of the organizations and lowers the level of trust from sponsors and the public. This prevents those who need assistance from getting access to it. Questions arise about the transparency of NGO budget expenditures. DanChurchAid, the largest Danish organization, strives for transparency in its budgeting and reports on corruption annually, listing all scandalous cases that occurred over the past year.

The financing of NGOs is concerning. They have large budgets, but it’s unclear if they use their funds to meet their policy objectives. This warrants further investigation. About 56% of NGOs have a leader linked to weapons production, and 54% have ties to the tobacco industry. It’s noteworthy that 59% of NGO leaders are from the banking sector.

According to the Council of Europe’s documents, NGO governance should not discriminate based on geography or nationality. At present, the majority of NGOs (72%) have their headquarters located in the Western world, with North America accounting for 36% and Europe accounting for 33%. NGOs that operate in Africa and the Middle East make up 35% of the total, while those operating in Asia make up 20%, and Latin America and the Caribbean make up 5%. NGO activities are distributed among different regions, with Europe accounting for 18% and North America and Oceania combined making up 5%. Countries belonging to the “majority world” are also included. There is a disparity in the representation of Africans and Asians in governing bodies of organizations, with only 8% and 14% respectively. Additionally, these groups tend to have higher educational attainment from Western universities. Globalization and civil society are expected to cause changes in the indicators of the “world of the majority.”

What is the future of NGOs?

NGOs are expected to increase as civil society becomes more active in each country and its role in global affairs grows. Loosely-organized groups within civil society may also emerge to pursue political objectives and shape public opinion. These groups disband once their goal is achieved. It is unclear if this system will be effective at improving the world.

The post Will NGOs survive in the future? appeared first on VP-btqd-GL.

The growth of non-governmental organizations is an essential aspect of a society in transition, facilitating communication and cooperation between civil institutions and governing bodies.

Non-governmental organizations have been referred to as “barefoot revolutions” or “popular power” in studies conducted by the Club of Rome. According to research conducted by the United Nations and the Union of International Associations, there have been over 35,000 registered non-governmental organizations worldwide since 1875. They existed in diverse forms, both legal and organizational, including associations, societies, foundations, unions, committees, clubs, leagues, and conferences, each with its own unique legal status.

The human rights protection system is commonly described in textbooks and teaching aids as a combination of intrastate, extra-state, and interstate methods. Non-state means of addressing human right violations involve the involvement of non-governmental organizations or public associations, which are often referred to as the “third sector”. These organizations utilize both domestic and international resources to assist in the restoration or protection of violated human right. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are considered vital by many countries in the world community, as they are seen as an additional mechanism for regulating public relations within civil society. Governments provide support for the third non-governmental sector’s activities.

Non-governmental organizations have two main directions. The first is informal and focuses on developing and promoting new international law norms to address urgent development needs. The second involves putting pressure on governments to ensure they comply with international law obligations. NGOs also work towards democratization and solving global issues.

An analysis of the third sector reveals varying levels of funding and attitudes towards their activities among different states. The United States and European countries have a well-developed third sector, with governments providing financial support to non-governmental organizations.

In the United States, a significant portion of budget expenditures for social and cultural needs is allocated to non-governmental organizations, including a majority of federal spending on social welfare, culture, science, and humanitarian purposes. Additionally, there are over one million public organizations in the US with a budget equivalent to 9% of the country’s national product.

The non-governmental sector in Germany and France primarily relies on public funding for their income.

The United States is a leading force in the development of the non-governmental sector. Across 22 European countries, there are approximately three million non-governmental organizations and 100 thousand foundations. These organizations have a total turnover equivalent to 1.1 trillion US dollars, which is comparable to the gross national product of countries like Italy and Great Britain.

One of the goals of the European human rights system is to promote democratic development and support the implementation of human rights across different areas. The Commissioner for Human Rights interacts with both states and non-governmental organizations at international, regional, and local levels to achieve this objective.

NGOs in different states have varying directions. In Germany, they have traditionally acted as a means to connect different segments of the population, such as the wealthy and the disadvantaged, due to their effectiveness in addressing social issues compared to charity or patronage.

The UK has close to 200,000 registered charities, with the third sector playing a notable role in the economy.

Non-governmental organizations in the Netherlands play a significant role in domestic politics. Referendums and public hearings are frequently held at different levels, contributing to societal stability and preventing corporate entities from dominating critical issues at the national, provincial, and municipal levels.

NGOs in Eastern Europe are currently being established and their goal, according to experts, is to promote democratic progress.

Non-governmental organizations in Islamic countries, including Great Britain, Germany and Iran, have traditionally focused on charitable activities aimed at solving social problems for low-income segments of the population. The number of non-governmental organizations in Iran today is over 20,000.

The national development plan in India prioritizes the partnership between NGOs and the government to implement programs aimed at combating poverty, with a focus on charitable actions and events.

Several countries, such as Egypt, India, Bangladesh, Argentina, Ecuador, Japan, and South Korea, have implemented policies requiring executive approval for NGOs to register, and promoting public welfare must be a goal of the organization.

The growth of non-governmental organizations in Central Asia is linked to their socio-economic and political status. Governments in the region have implemented laws regulating NGOs that receive foreign funding and engage in political activities.

Based on our analysis of NGO activities in different countries, the following conclusions can be made:

• The United States is a prominent player in the development and operation of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and often provides government funding for their various activities, which cover a broad range of socio-cultural, socio-economic, political, and other areas. The United States is also known for promoting democratic reforms and human rights globally, although this position has sparked criticism and protests from some countries who view it as meddling in their internal affairs;
• NGOs in the US and Western Europe play an active role in shaping state policy through various means such as promoting civil initiatives, lobbying, monitoring social relations, and identifying emerging problems. The relationship between the state and non-government sectors is well-established and conflicts in their activities are minimized;
• Several governments across different countries have implemented policies that require NGOs to contribute to public welfare. This includes countries such as Egypt, India, Bangladesh, Argentina, Ecuador, Japan, and South Korea;
• Certain countries, such as Egypt, India, Mexico, Nepal, Ethiopia, and Venezuela, have more rigorous regulations regarding foreign funding for NGOs, while other countries like Belarus and China have even implemented complete bans on such support measures for NGOs receiving outside funding efforts from foreign organizations within their borders;
• NGOs receiving foreign financial support primarily engage in socially-oriented projects within states where special legal regimes have been established.

The post The history of the formation of non-governmental organizations appeared first on VP-btqd-GL.

vulnerable people – the poor, the unemployed, the elderly, minors, people with disabilities, single women, single mothers, widows, members of single-parent, large and dysfunctional families, orphans, people with severe and incurable diseases, residents of remote villages, refugees from Syria and Ukraine, migrants and all others who have difficulty relying on their own strength and who need special support;
People who are persecuted because of their social and/or political position;
people whose fundamental rights have been grossly violated and who have been unjustly treated.

Second, legal assistance from community-based organizations is different from that provided by lawyers for a fee. In community-based organizations, it is a component of human rights advocacy. We focus in particular on violations of basic human rights resulting from official arbitrariness and unjust treatment. The violation of fundamental rights or freedoms is always a large-scale problem, even if it affects one person. Rights and freedoms are common goods, should be enjoyed by all and should be inviolable for everyone. The challenge for human rights organizations is to prevent violators from undermining rights and to prevent violations from becoming an everyday occurrence. In providing assistance, we are first and foremost about advancing human rights.

Third, they focus on empowering vulnerable people by helping them overcome circumstances that render them defenseless. Vulnerability often leads to rights violations, so it is important that vulnerable people are able to work with community workers to correct rights violations and hold perpetrators accountable. By participating in the protection of their rights, vulnerable people can gain the necessary experience that will enable them in the future to independently stand up for their rights and help other people by passing on this experience.

Fourth, they draw attention to abuses that authorities refuse to recognize and address.

Fifth, employees of public organizations guarantee equal treatment and equal conditions for assistance to each person who applies. We advocate the principle of equality on the part of other people, authorities, and political representatives and assist in overcoming unequal and unfair treatment.

Sixthly, NGOs always provide assistance free of charge. This is possible thanks to the financial support of partner organizations we trust (e.g., international organizations that promote and protect human rights in different parts of the world) or through volunteer work.

The post What are the peculiarities of the human rights activities of public organizations? appeared first on VP-btqd-GL.

Most of the organizations that proclaim themselves “human rights” tend to protect civil and political rights. The best known of these organizations, at least in the international arena, are Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, International Federation for Human Rights, Human Rights First, and InterRights. However, as we have seen, civil and political rights are only one of many categories of different human rights recognized by the international community. Moreover, new rights continue to arise even today. If we take all this into account and include in this list non-governmental organizations confronting poverty, violence, racism, health problems, homelessness and conservation, to say nothing of many others, the true number of non-governmental organizations engaged in defending human rights in one form or another would number in the hundreds of thousands around the world.

How do they affect the process?

Non-governmental organizations may attempt to engage in human rights advocacy on many different fronts and levels, and the strategies they employ will vary according to the nature of their goals: they may be more general or more specific, long-term or short-term, local, national or international in scope, etc.

Direct assistance
A common characteristic of non-governmental organizations active in the field of social and economic rights is the provision of some form of direct assistance to victims of human rights violations. This can be humanitarian assistance, protection, or training for a new profession. If the right is protected by law, it can be legal assistance or advice on how to file a lawsuit. However, in many cases, direct assistance to the victim of human rights violations is either not possible or is not the best way to use the resources of a human rights organization.

Gathering reliable information
If there is one basic strategy upon which various forms of NGO activity are based, it seems to be the desire to “stigmatize” those who do injustice. Very often governments may evade obligations under international agreements they have signed, or other legal standards, because the results of their policies are simply not known to the general public. Gathering such information and using it to “stigmatize” governments is necessary to hold perpetrators accountable, and is therefore often used by non-governmental organizations.

The post Types of human rights NGOs appeared first on VP-btqd-GL.

But there are cases when, having suffered a violation of rights, you become defenseless because:

• you are left alone with your problem because those who are supposed to protect you do not recognize the violation of your rights;
• it is difficult for you to convey the truth – they do not want to listen to you and strengthen the confidence that you are right and can get justice;
• such violations have become habitual, they are not eliminated, and you believe that it is impossible to fight against them;
• you are afraid that trying to protect your rights on your own will make your situation worse;
• you are subjected to unfair treatment because of your social status, nationality, political views, etc;
• you do not have reliable information about how your problem is solved by the authorities;
• you do not have enough money to regularly pay for the services of lawyers;
• the solution to your problem is deliberately delayed and does not move forward;
• you cannot influence the way you are protected, and you believe that the actions of your representative or defender are ineffective;
• Your opponent has great power because of his or her relationship or status, and is purposefully opposing a solution to your problem;
• Decisions made by the authorities in your interests are not implemented.

If you find yourself in the situation described above, seek help from public organizations that have legal liaison offices.

The post Why should I go to the offices of public organizations when my rights are violated? appeared first on VP-btqd-GL.

Letter campaigns are a method used effectively by Amnesty International and other NGOs. Organizations “bombard” government officials with letters from thousands of their members around the world

Street actions or demonstrations with media coverage, which usually show interest in such events, can be used when organizations want to garner public support or bring something to public attention and “shame” the government.
The media will often continue to play an important role in lobbying practices, but now social media and the Internet are becoming increasingly important.
NGOs submit their “alternative” reports to the UN monitoring body, thus creating an overall picture of the reality of human rights in a given country.

In addition to demonstrations of support or public outcry, NGOs can also hold informal meetings or briefings for officials. Sometimes the mere threat of making something public is enough to bring about a change in policy or practice, as the story below shows. Where once tapes, posters, or faxes were used for this purpose, now electronic mailing and petition campaigns, Internet sites, blogs, and social media are used.

In general, the more support a campaign has from the public or other powerful institutions (another government, for example), the more likely it is that it will achieve its goals. Even if NGOs do not always use such support directly, pointing to the possibility of mobilizing a broad popular movement against a government is enough to make their voice heard.

Many human rights NGOs engage in public awareness or educational work, at least as one of their activities. Realizing that the general public is the basis of their support, NGOs try to reach individuals with as much information about human rights issues as possible. The more aware people are of these issues and of the methods of protecting human rights, the more likely they are to be respected, which in turn provides more opportunities to mobilize support for specific human rights violations. It is this support, real or potential, that underlies the success of NGOs in improving the legal environment.

The post Campaigning and lobbying appeared first on VP-btqd-GL.

Fighting individual human rights abuses, either directly or by appealing “emblematic” cases to the appropriate judicial authorities
by providing direct assistance to those whose rights have been violated
By advocating for changes in national, regional and international law
Helping to improve the content of these laws;
disseminating among the population knowledge of and respect for human rights.

The contribution of NGOs is important not only in terms of the results they achieve and the optimism they inspire regarding the protection of human rights in our world, but also because NGOs are, in the truest sense, a means of protection available to individuals and groups around the world. They–like many other organizations–are run and coordinated by individuals, but beyond that their strength derives in no small measure from the voluntary support of other members of society for their cause. This fact makes them especially important in the eyes of people who would like to contribute to improving the human rights situation in the world.

The post What is an NGO? appeared first on VP-btqd-GL.